
The History of Islam is replete with the unabated persecution of Shia Muslims for the last thirteen hundred years. The imperialist United States propped up a despotic Sunni Muslim ruler, Saddam Hussein, in our country though we constituted majority. Little wonder, he unleashed a reign of terror on us, the Shia Muslims. Even when the US waged a war against Saddam Hussein to get Kuwait from his clutches, we did not get our due share and the US betrayed us though we threw our weight behind the US against despotic Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps, oil interest of the US in Saudi Arabia, smarting smugly as the custodian of Sunni Islam in the world in the wake of increasing power of the petro-dollar, failed to see the ground realities in the picturesque Iraq.
Even when the US has paid and is paying a heavy price by attacking Saddam’s Iraq, it has failed to enlist the whole-hearted support of the Shia Muslims, as the US can’t displease its oil-ally Saudi Arabia.
Now under the overt pressure of Saudi Arabia, the US has launched a tirade against our neighbor, Iran, the Shia-dominated country in the world, in the name of containing the weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). The call of the time is for the unification of voices of all Shia Muslims spread all over the world, particularly in the Islamic countries, against this domination of Sunni Muslims and their smug claim to be true heir of the legacy of the Prophet.
Yes, Islam calls for the universal brotherhood and all the Muslims, irrespective to their allegiance to various schools of thought should stand united against any attack on their religion, which has become a throne in the eyes of the Christian world, but does it mean the Majority Sunni Muslims should be allowed to perpetuate atrocities on their Sunni Muslim brothers.
A sound oil policy in the Gulf requires three shifts in political thought, economy, and domestic energy policies. The US should reject the geopolitical security thinking of the cold war in favor of a post-cold war policy that understands today’s world of economic interdependence and linkages.
It requires US policymakers to concentrate on the root causes of interstate tensions in the Gulf regions. Some of such tensions could disrupt oil production and its flow to the international oil markets. Military production and weapons sales provided a major source of economic strength to the US during the cold war. This should shift to other sectors of the domestic economy to allow greater US competitiveness in world markets, including oil markets, and reduce the dangerous arms races in the Middle East and elsewhere.
The third shift in policy orientation should be in energy conservation and the search for alternative and affordable energy sources. Alternative energy is vital for an atmosphere free of pollution and an environmentally safer world.
PLEASE REMEMBER, it is only fight against terror.
The war against terror will be over when war against Iran is over. Then all terror problems will resolve themselves. We wouldn't need guns and F-16s anymore.
DON'T FORGET PLEASE!
Iran would do better to see Bush off by conceding to some of the demands, which are backed by international community unlike in the case of Iraq invasion. Believe it or not, it is up to you. But there can be no second reason for Iran's nuclear program than building bombs and holding the middle east to ransom and threaten Israel.
The Iranian regime will be as guilty of this possible war if not more than the US government. No one likes Bush, but this time he is probably right. Iran must not have nuclear weapons. This is definitely pushing middle east and the gulf region to even greater catastrophe. Naturally, Jordan will not remain unscathed should another war starts here.
No Way. It may be Bush or any other president, policy to remain same.
Local Opinions (3)
Global Opinions (27)
No Way. It may be Bush or any other president, policy to remain same.
A sound oil policy in the Gulf requires three shifts in political thought, economy, and domestic energy policies. The US should reject the geopolitical security thinking of the cold war in favor of a post-cold war policy that understands today’s world of economic interdependence and linkages.
It requires US policymakers to concentrate on the root causes of interstate tensions in the Gulf regions. Some of such tensions could disrupt oil production and its flow to the international oil markets. Military production and weapons sales provided a major source of economic strength to the US during the cold war. This should shift to other sectors of the domestic economy to allow greater US competitiveness in world markets, including oil markets, and reduce the dangerous arms races in the Middle East and elsewhere.
The third shift in policy orientation should be in energy conservation and the search for alternative and affordable energy sources. Alternative energy is vital for an atmosphere free of pollution and an environmentally safer world.
PLEASE REMEMBER, it is only fight against terror.
The war against terror will be over when war against Iran is over. Then all terror problems will resolve themselves. We wouldn't need guns and F-16s anymore.
DON'T FORGET PLEASE!
Iran would do better to see Bush off by conceding to some of the demands, which are backed by international community unlike in the case of Iraq invasion. Believe it or not, it is up to you. But there can be no second reason for Iran's nuclear program than building bombs and holding the middle east to ransom and threaten Israel.
The Iranian regime will be as guilty of this possible war if not more than the US government. No one likes Bush, but this time he is probably right. Iran must not have nuclear weapons. This is definitely pushing middle east and the gulf region to even greater catastrophe. Naturally, Jordan will not remain unscathed should another war starts here.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 


























